Iraqi-American artist Michael Rakowitz’s request for the museum to return an Assyrian sculpture follows a larger, decades-long struggle to gain repatriation.

Iraqi-American artist Michael Rakowitz's request for the museum to return an Assyrian sculpture follows a larger, decades-long struggle to gain repatriation.

WORDS

WORDS

DATE:

WORDS

DATE

SHARE

Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Email

SHARE

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email
Michael Rakowitz, Fourth Pliny Exhibition, museum
Michael Rakowitz, The Invisible Enemy Should Not Exist, 2018. Photography by Rick Findler.

Iraqi-American artist Michael Rakowitz is the latest artist in a series of activists demanding the repatriation of art aquired from predominantly African and Asian countries. Rakowitz's public request was targeted at the British Museum, which has received six formal requests to repatriate a collective total of 149 artifacts from various organizations between 2014 and 2020. The majority of requests came from indigenous peoples, though a few were sent from Indian government officials  and Ethiopia's Minister of Culture. 

Rakowitz is unique, however, in that he is proposing a trade on behalf of Iraq. For one of two large Assyrian gypsum statues, a lamassu, or Assyrian protective deity, he is offering one of his own creations in exchange: a large-scale lamassu decorated with date-syrup cans, to be given to the Tate Modern, an affiliate of the British Museum, on the condition that it share custody with Iraq. In an article published by the Guardian, Rakowitz explains that he is seeking to supplant what has been ransacked by both Western forces and the militant Islamic group Daesh.

Image courtesy of the British Museum.

So far the artist has an ally in the Tate Modern, which informally agreed to lobby for the lamassu's return. The British Museum's response, however, has yet to be received. Historically, the museum has sent replicas in place of genuine artifacts, and Rakowitz recalls his past demands for repatriation of the artifacts being dismissed in 2020.

Its reluctance is to be expected; Section 5 of the 1963 British Museum Act compels British Museum Trustees to repatriate their objects only if the object was made after 1850, found out to be a dupe, or no longer educationally enriching. Since then, they have had free rein to disregard requests which don't fall into accordance with these three niche specifications.

Rakowitz regards the British Museum's half-hearted efforts in creating replicas and citing regulations with thinly-veiled contempt. "Where's the dignity," he asked in the same Guardian article, "of sending back these things that are basically a husk of the original?" 

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

Not a Doomscroll. A Deep Dive.

Subscribe now for print that informs, inspires, and doesn’t get lost in the feed.

You’ve almost hit your limit.

You’re approaching your limit of complementary articles. For expanded access, become a digital subscriber for less than $2 a week.

You’re approaching your limit of complementary articles. For expanded access, become a digital subscriber for less than $2 a week.

Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here

You’re approaching your limit of complementary articles. For expanded access, become a digital subscriber for less than $2 a week.

GET ACCESS

Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here

Want more in your life?

For less than the price of a cocktail, you can help independent journalism thrive.

Pop-Up-1_c
Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here
Pop-Up-1_c

Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here

Want more in your life?

For less than the price of a cocktail, you can help independent journalism thrive.

Pop-Up-1_c
Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here
Pop-Up-1_c

Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here

You’ve almost hit your limit.

You’re approaching your limit of complementary articles. For expanded access, become a digital subscriber for less than $2 a week.

You’re approaching your limit of complementary articles. For expanded access, become a digital subscriber for less than $2 a week.
Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here
You’re approaching your limit of complementary articles. For expanded access, become a digital subscriber for less than $2 a week.

Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here

Want more in your life?

For less than the price of a cocktail, you can help independent journalism thrive.

Pop-Up-1_c

Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here

Pop-Up-1_c

Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here

We have so much more to tell you.

You’ve reached your limit.

Sign up for a digital subscription, starting at less than $2 a week.

Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here

Want a seat at the table? To continue reading this article, sign up today.

Support independent criticism for $10/month (or just $110/year).

Already a subscriber? Log in.