CULTURED asked top architects to name the cities around the world they deem most architecturally progressive. Here are their picks.

CULTURED asked top architects to name the cities around the world they deem most architecturally progressive. Here are their picks.

WORDS

WORDS

DATE:

DATE

SHARE

Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Email

SHARE

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email

As you plan your travel agenda for 2025, why not explore some of the world's most foward-thinking, design-savvy cities? As part of CULTURED’s Spatial Awareness column, which aims to pull back the curtain on the world of architecture, Karen Wong asked leaders in the discipline to name the most progressive architectural city they've ever visited. Their wide-ranging answers are below. Plane tickets sold separately. 

Ada-tolla-architect
Portrait of Ada Tolla by Aundre Larrow. Image courtesy of Tolla.

Ada Tolla of LOT-EK

“I’m interested in cities that can hold differences and contrasts, and are rich with complex humanity. I consider ‘progressive’ cities with everyone and everything. Cities where issues are in the light rather than removed, out of sight. My hometowns of New York and Napoli are models of great humanity and a constant work in progress.”

Zeina-koreitem-architect
Portrait of Zeina Koreitem by Bryson Malone. Image courtesy of MILLIØNS.

Zeina Koreitem of MILLIØNS

“I have lived and worked on many continents, seeking stability and a vague notion of liberation. There is no perfect city and no one definition of a progressive place. The 'West' claimed to be 'progressive' for a century but racism, socio-economic failures, Islamophobia, and toxic prejudice prevail. Cities in the Global South that are perceived as oppressive in the eyes of the 'West' have social bonds and communal traditions that are more meaningful and reliable than Modernity’s principles. Empires rise and fall, but what matters in the end is community, empathy, and knowledge.”

Sekou-Cooke-architect
Portrait of Sekou Cooke by Julie Herman. Image courtesy of Sekou Cooke Studio.

Sekou Cooke

“Amsterdam, for sure (at least in how I understand the term ‘progressive’). Even the lowliest sidewalk or street sign is designed to a higher standard than most public buildings in the U.S. I’m still generally more impressed by a city like Cairo, where it’s almost impossible to figure out its underlying logics, yet it works beautifully and effortlessly in a frantically chaotic kind of way.”

Minsuk-Cho
Portrait of Minsuk Cho by Mok Jungwook. Image courtesy of Cho.

Minsuk Cho of Mass Studies

“This is a trick question—progress can be defined in many ways! I nominate Kyoto, a city nearly 1,500 years old that remains vibrant, cosmopolitan, and contemporary because of its heritage.”

Dominic-leong-architect
Portrait of Dominic Leong by Jennifer Czyborra. Image courtesy of Leong Leong.

Dominic Leong of Leong Leong

“I can’t think of a single city but the most progressive ideas driving the next wave of sustainability, or what’s been named ‘regenerative design,’ remind me of the ways of knowing that Native communities have protected for centuries before they were erased. Is there a contemporary city that gives back more than it takes from the land? That’s what we need to keep working towards.”

Annabelle-selldorf-architect
Photography by Ralph Mecke and courtesy of Selldorf Architects.

Annabelle Selldorf

“Maybe Doha? It depends on the interpretation of ‘progressive.’”

Photography by Manfredi Gioacchini. Image courtesy of WHY Architecture.

Kulapat Yantrasast of WHY Architecture 

“Tokyo.”

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

Not a Doomscroll. A Deep Dive.

Subscribe now for print that informs, inspires, and doesn’t get lost in the feed.

You’ve almost hit your limit.

You’re approaching your limit of complementary articles. For expanded access, become a digital subscriber for less than $2 a week.

You’re approaching your limit of complementary articles. For expanded access, become a digital subscriber for less than $2 a week.

Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here

You’re approaching your limit of complementary articles. For expanded access, become a digital subscriber for less than $2 a week.

GET ACCESS

Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here

Want more in your life?

For less than the price of a cocktail, you can help independent journalism thrive.

Pop-Up-1_c
Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here
Pop-Up-1_c

Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here

Want more in your life?

For less than the price of a cocktail, you can help independent journalism thrive.

Pop-Up-1_c
Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here
Pop-Up-1_c

Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here

You’ve almost hit your limit.

You’re approaching your limit of complementary articles. For expanded access, become a digital subscriber for less than $2 a week.

You’re approaching your limit of complementary articles. For expanded access, become a digital subscriber for less than $2 a week.
Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here
You’re approaching your limit of complementary articles. For expanded access, become a digital subscriber for less than $2 a week.

Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here

Want more in your life?

For less than the price of a cocktail, you can help independent journalism thrive.

Pop-Up-1_c

Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here

Pop-Up-1_c

Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here

We have so much more to tell you.

You’ve reached your limit.

Sign up for a digital subscription, starting at less than $2 a week.

Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here

Want a seat at the table? To continue reading this article, sign up today.

Support independent criticism for $10/month (or just $110/year).

Already a subscriber? Log in.