During this pandemic, we look to past architectural responses to crises for inspiration.

During this pandemic, we look to past architectural responses to crises for inspiration.

WORDS

WORDS

DATE:

WORDS

DATE

SHARE

Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Email

SHARE

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email

Photography by Lee F. Mindel, FAIA.
Photography by Lee F. Mindel, FAIA.

Nestled in the woods in southwestern Finland is the Alvar Aalto-designed Paimio Sanatorium. Built in 1933, it was originally designed as a response to the tuberculosis crisis that unfolded in the early 20th century.

In lieu of a cure, the health protocol for the diseased consisted of supporting their respiratory and immune systems with fresh air, calm and nature.

The sanatorium was designed to provide patients with views of nature. Photography by Lee F. Mindel, FAIA.

In addition to being in a peaceful and remote location, Aalto’s design reflected the health protocol with architectural integrity: there are indoor/outdoor solariums, a sun-splashed double-height cafeteria, calming yellow and blue tones as an alternative to sterile white, windowed rooms connecting to the landscape, no splash sinks and non-glare lighting. Each architectural decision meant to ease and comfort.

What we learn from the past inspires our present and informs our future. As Aalto so aptly stated, “Building art is a synthesis of life in materialized form.”

Instead of “sterile white,” calming colors were used throughout the facility to promote calm. Photography by Lee F. Mindel, FAIA.

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

Not a Doomscroll. A Deep Dive.

Subscribe now for print that informs, inspires, and doesn’t get lost in the feed.

You’ve almost hit your limit.

You’re approaching your limit of complementary articles. For expanded access, become a digital subscriber for less than $2 a week.

You’re approaching your limit of complementary articles. For expanded access, become a digital subscriber for less than $2 a week.

Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here

You’re approaching your limit of complementary articles. For expanded access, become a digital subscriber for less than $2 a week.

GET ACCESS

Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here

Want more in your life?

For less than the price of a cocktail, you can help independent journalism thrive.

Pop-Up-1_c
Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here
Pop-Up-1_c

Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here

Want more in your life?

For less than the price of a cocktail, you can help independent journalism thrive.

Pop-Up-1_c
Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here
Pop-Up-1_c

Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here

You’ve almost hit your limit.

You’re approaching your limit of complementary articles. For expanded access, become a digital subscriber for less than $2 a week.

You’re approaching your limit of complementary articles. For expanded access, become a digital subscriber for less than $2 a week.
Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here
You’re approaching your limit of complementary articles. For expanded access, become a digital subscriber for less than $2 a week.

Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here

Want more in your life?

For less than the price of a cocktail, you can help independent journalism thrive.

Pop-Up-1_c

Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here

Pop-Up-1_c

Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here

We have so much more to tell you.

You’ve reached your limit.

Sign up for a digital subscription, starting at less than $2 a week.

Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here

Want a seat at the table? To continue reading this article, sign up today.

Support independent criticism for $10/month (or just $110/year).

Already a subscriber? Log in.