The polarizing 1980s 60 Wall Street skyscraper by Kevin Roche and John Dinkeloo will receive a contemporary design rehaul when it changes ownership this summer. Artist Benjamin Kellogg opines why this demolition precedent is devastating to the future of architecture.

The polarizing 1980s 60 Wall Street skyscraper by Kevin Roche and John Dinkeloo will receive a contemporary design rehaul when it changes ownership this summer.

WORDS

WORDS

DATE:

SHARE

Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Email

SHARE

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email

Deep in the narrow canyons of the financial epicenter of the West lies an out-of-place yet overlooked courtyard that is as idyllic and palatial as the fanciful gardens of the East. Situated on a lot between New York’s Pine and Wall streets is a behemoth of postmodern corporate style—60 Wall Street, at one point the largest corporate building in the city’s Financial District.

The skyscraper—including its distinctive lobby—was designed by the late Irish-born architect and Eero Saarinen protégé Kevin Roche and John Dinkeloo of Kevin Roche John Dinkeloo and Associates, also known for the Ford Foundation and the 1967 expansion of the Metropolitan Museum of Art, both notable for their impressive indoor gardens. 60 Wall Street is a shapeshifting mashup of architectural styles; Like the Art Deco movement architects did in the early 20th century, Roche embellished his work with ancient motifs filtered through the lens of modern engineering: the exterior is a fusion of Greek Revival, Neoclassical and Postmodernist elements, with their complex structural ornamentation details modulated as simpler shapes.

 60 Wall Street's current privately owned public space, designed by Kevin Roche and John Dinkeloo in 1989. Photography courtesy of KRJDA.

Pillared halls of paired stone columns 70 feet high anchor the base of the 51-story tower, creating the illusion of a granite curtain framing the entrances to the north and south. Within this facade, an architectural colonnade transfers passage to a monumental atrium designated by the city as a “privately owned public space,” a type of zoning regulation incentive that grants extra air space and floor area in exchange for open usable space dedicated to public enjoyment. The style of this interior alludes to Mughal design: it’s a winter garden with flowering octagonal columns supporting mirrored ceilings framed with white trelliswork, inducing a reflective kaleidoscopic effect that Roche has been known to utilize.

Photography courtesy of KRJDA.

The atrium offers an escape from the claustrophobia of the Financial District. In the morning, a rush hour crowd workers hurries through it on their way to their offices and for the rest of the day, a mix of people from all walks of life convene beneath the seasonal plantings and 20-foot-tall ornamental white stones that adorn its interior walls.

Like all architectural styles have at some point, Postmodernism is passing through its own personal phase of rejection by the status quo. A gauntlet of renovations masked as “updates” by real estate developers who view the style as outdated, undesirable for modern corporate tenancy and therefore, in theory, bad for the bottom line, have occurred in such spaces across the United States in recent years, including the destruction of the AT&T Building atrium at 550 Madison and the Hall of Gems and Minerals at the American Museum of Natural History, both in New York.

60 Wall Street, as completed in 1989. Photography courtesy of KRJDA.

60 Wall Street is facing a similar fate. Its current occupant, In the next few months, Deutsche Bank, is moving to the Time Warner Center at Columbus Circle. Recent changes in leasehold have left 60 Wall Street vulnerable to radical renovations: one party in the ownership group, the Paramount Group, have already redeveloped another KRJDA lobby at the old Deutsche Bank building on West 52nd Street, stripping it of any unique qualities in favor of something more sterile—and considerably bland. It was, in my opinion, a tragic loss of one of the more beautiful spaces in New York City, one that should never happen again.

Conceptual rendering of the redesigned 60 Wall Street by KPF.
Wall Street facade by KPF.
Redesigned public atrium with greenwall and skylight.
Redesigned Wall Street lobby.

However, the Paramount Group has construction plans, set to begin in summer 2022, to demolish the 60 Wall Street atrium inside and out in favor of a narrow skylight and a 100-foot-tall greenwall design by Kohn Pedersen Fox. In addition, the exterior stone colonnade will be targeted for intense updating to the point of total unrecognition, despite its overt charm and attention to detail. Lauding these cliché design decisions as “new” and “lively” comes at the cost of another huge blow to the historical legacy of Roche’s genius.

The KRJDA design of the 60 Wall Street atrium is beloved by many fans of the Postmodern movement who time and time again face the need to justify its continued architectural existence as iconic examples of the era are routinely misunderstood and destroyed. In 2018, the AT&T Building by Philip Johnson became New York’s youngest landmark; however, its designation was exterior-only and could not stop the fate of its beloved PoMo lobby. Without better preservation of these works of art, we face a bleak future: one without style and robbed of unique architectural experiences.

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

Not a Doomscroll. A Deep Dive.

Subscribe now for print that informs, inspires, and doesn’t get lost in the feed.

You’ve almost hit your limit.

You’re approaching your limit of complementary articles. For expanded access, become a digital subscriber for less than $2 a week.

You’re approaching your limit of complementary articles. For expanded access, become a digital subscriber for less than $2 a week.

Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here

You’re approaching your limit of complementary articles. For expanded access, become a digital subscriber for less than $2 a week.

GET ACCESS

Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here

Want more in your life?

For less than the price of a cocktail, you can help independent journalism thrive.

Pop-Up-1_c
Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here
Pop-Up-1_c

Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here

Want more in your life?

For less than the price of a cocktail, you can help independent journalism thrive.

Pop-Up-1_c
Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here
Pop-Up-1_c

Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here

You’ve almost hit your limit.

You’re approaching your limit of complementary articles. For expanded access, become a digital subscriber for less than $2 a week.

You’re approaching your limit of complementary articles. For expanded access, become a digital subscriber for less than $2 a week.
Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here
You’re approaching your limit of complementary articles. For expanded access, become a digital subscriber for less than $2 a week.

Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here

Want more in your life?

For less than the price of a cocktail, you can help independent journalism thrive.

Pop-Up-1_c

Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here

Pop-Up-1_c

Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here

We have so much more to tell you.

You’ve reached your limit.

Sign up for a digital subscription, starting at less than $2 a week.

Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here

Want a seat at the table? To continue reading this article, sign up today.

Support independent criticism for $10/month (or just $110/year).

Already a subscriber? Log in.