In Chongqing, China, the 2019 Hot Pot Master Garden at the Upper Yangtze River City Flower Art Expo was designed by Martha Schwartz Partners.  New Yorkers may remember Martha Schwartz, 70, as the woman who replaced Tilted Arc, a much hated and controversial Richard Serra sculpture in a Lower Manhattan plaza, with an array of […]

 In Chongqing, China, the 2019 Hot Pot Master Garden at the Upper Yangtze River City Flower Art Expo was designed by Martha Schwartz Partners.  New

WORDS

WORDS

DATE:

SHARE

Twitter
LinkedIn
Facebook
Email

SHARE

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email

 

In Chongqing, China, the 2019 Hot Pot Master Garden at the Upper Yangtze River City Flower Art Expo was designed by Martha Schwartz Partners.
In Chongqing, China, the 2019 Hot Pot Master Garden at the Upper Yangtze River City Flower Art Expo was designed by Martha Schwartz Partners.

 

New Yorkers may remember Martha Schwartz, 70, as the woman who replaced Tilted Arc, a much hated and controversial Richard Serra sculpture in a Lower Manhattan plaza, with an array of goofy circular benches surrounding Hostess Sno Ball-shaped grassy mounds. That was in the 1990s. Since then, most of her landscape projects have been in China or Europe. Typically, they’re urban plazas punctuated by startling blazes of color and surprising sculptural interjections. If landscape architecture is a balance between nature and artifice, Schwartz appeared to lean toward the latter

But not anymore. Speaking from her Harlem studio, she explains, “I’ve actually stopped practicing as a landscape architect.” Instead she’s repositioned herself as a crusader for her profession’s role in stopping global warming. As a professor at Harvard’s Graduate School of Design, she’s gotten to know her neighbors, specifically the university’s geoengineers. “And they know everything you need to know about climate change.”

 

Martha Schwartz standing woman
Martha Schwartz.

 

Schwartz argues that some 70 percent of the world’s populations will be living in cities by 2050. So how those cities are built is crucial to the planet’s survival. “I have a grant from Harvard to study the linear urban forest,” she says. The basic idea is that the infinite amount of land currently used as streets and covered in asphalt needs to be permeable, so that storm water replenishes our aquifers, and intensively planted with trees.

What might the planet-saving approach to landscape design look like? Schwartz mentions an airport-design competition her firm won. The project is unbuilt and she can’t reveal the client, but the idea—dizzyingly counterintuitive—is that it would be the world’s first “carbon negative” airport. The airport would essentially be a vast earthworks sculpture made from types of rock that “bond with carbon dioxide and sequester carbon.” While the concept itself is seductive, what clearly sold the project was the renderings depicting a swirly, colorful, incredibly futuristic terrain.

But Schwartz’s main work right now is making the case, through lectures and lobbying within the profession, that landscape architects are uniquely positioned to radically remake urban places and help undo the urban “heat-island effect.” Her argument is simple: “We fucked it up so badly. Fundamentally, we have to unfuck up the earth, we have to regenerate it. If we’re going to survive, we have to see it in a different way.

Craving more culture? Sign up to receive the Cultured newsletter, a biweekly guide to what’s new and what’s next in art, architecture, design and more.

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

Not a Doomscroll. A Deep Dive.

Subscribe now for print that informs, inspires, and doesn’t get lost in the feed.

You’ve almost hit your limit.

You’re approaching your limit of complementary articles. For expanded access, become a digital subscriber for less than $2 a week.

You’re approaching your limit of complementary articles. For expanded access, become a digital subscriber for less than $2 a week.

Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here

You’re approaching your limit of complementary articles. For expanded access, become a digital subscriber for less than $2 a week.

GET ACCESS

Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here

Want more in your life?

For less than the price of a cocktail, you can help independent journalism thrive.

Pop-Up-1_c
Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here
Pop-Up-1_c

Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here

Want more in your life?

For less than the price of a cocktail, you can help independent journalism thrive.

Pop-Up-1_c
Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here
Pop-Up-1_c

Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here

You’ve almost hit your limit.

You’re approaching your limit of complementary articles. For expanded access, become a digital subscriber for less than $2 a week.

You’re approaching your limit of complementary articles. For expanded access, become a digital subscriber for less than $2 a week.
Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here
You’re approaching your limit of complementary articles. For expanded access, become a digital subscriber for less than $2 a week.

Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here

Want more in your life?

For less than the price of a cocktail, you can help independent journalism thrive.

Pop-Up-1_c

Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here

Pop-Up-1_c

Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here

We have so much more to tell you.

You’ve reached your limit.

Sign up for a digital subscription, starting at less than $2 a week.

Already a Subscriber? Sign in Here

Want a seat at the table? To continue reading this article, sign up today.

Support independent criticism for $10/month (or just $110/year).

Already a subscriber? Log in.